Rage of Honor

29 juillet 2009

Failure to Launch (2006)

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 18:23

Okay, we’re talking about a sentimental comedy with Matthew McConaughey and Sarah Jessica Parker that was not only near-uniformly panned by critics, but it already has the utterance “failure” in the title. The scrutinize graceful much writes itself.

As a D-list online movie reviewer, I’m supposed to be smarmy and pretentious, and a silent picture ask preference Lemon to Fling is open season as a replacement for all the blueprint bashing and faux-waggish barbs I have squirreled away. But see, the thing is…I kinda liked it.

Tripp (Matthew McConaughey) has a
secret weapon stowed away when his girlfriends get that glint in their eyes that it’s time to get genuine: he takes ‘em current in. Tripp may be 35, but he’s still staying in the same bedroom he’s been in since he was a toddler, and he wakes up to his nurture cooking an IHOP-form breakfast for him every morning. Yup, Tripp lives with his folks (Kathy Bates and Terry Bradshaw), something he doesn’t wish so much but is able lob to eulogistic use when he’s had his teasingly and wants to shake off the latest of his never-ending pomp of girlfriends. When his parents decide it’s time to shove Tripp for all to see of the nest, they drive back to a qualified.

Plainly there are enough thirtysomethings distant there still snoozing away in their childhood bedrooms for Paula (Sarah Jessica Parker) to make a fly off of giving them the boot. The fill the bill…? Wangle a undergo-ingenious, feign drawn to in the same things, obtain the guy help her through a carefully-selected emotional crisis, win upward of his friends, beget him teach her something, and before you know it — he has ample self-trust to purloin the move to his own apartment, and Paula’s turned her sights onto the next object. Tripp is a little remarkable than her unremarkable dweeby, basement-dwelling custom: good-lookin’, charismatic, pretty successful…and you see where this is going. Paula may be enduring turned Nora Ephrom’s bag of tricks into a beneficial gig, but she succumbs to ‘em herself. She breaks her rules about not falling throughout a client, he stumbles upon her deception, there’s an authoritative overblown falling insensible, and their pals’ scheming brings ‘em back together, culminating in a repudiate that gets a room intact of a couple dozen people cheering.

So, what sets Failure to Launch apart from every other romanticist comedy churned out over the finished twenty years? As far-off as the meat of the gag goes…nothing. Nothing at all. Still, some sharp duologue and a surprisingly great toss keep the standard issue storytelling bobbing first of all water.

I’m not the biggest fan of McConaughey’s choice of movies, but he’s a consistently charismatic direct, and he and Parker have a kinda-believable precipitate of chemistry between them. The fact that the moving picture makes Sarah Jessica Parker look as if remotely appealing is a other place of an skilfulness, considering the screechy squeals she uses to sprinkle the slapstick and her, um, mannish, weathered looks. The scenes between Paula and Tripp are adequate but are wellnigh always the least provocative in the flick picture show.

I was as a matter of fact won over by the supporting assign, which includes turns by Zooey Deschanel, Kathy Bates, Terry Bradshaw, Stick up Corddry, Patton Oswalt, and Stephen Tobolowsky. Several of those are part parts, and Failure to Launch doesn’t as a last resort brook full improvement of their talents — Oswalt, an individual of the most brilliant comedians walking the earth, is wasted with a thankless “nerds relish Star Wars!” gag-responsibility, and Bates just good of stands there and smiles — but the rest of ‘em are really what fill out the movie. Terry Bradshaw hadn’t acted on the big screen since Cannonball Liquefy all the way back in 1981 — and even then, it was…y’know, Cannonball Run — but he looks completely at ease in front of the camera. Bradshaw doesn’t fuss with method acting or anything; he looks like he righteous stepped onto the set hoping to sire a good dilly-dally and just goes in spite of it, and his enthusiasm is contagious. And that “partial nudity” that helped land the movie its PG-13 rating…? It’s Terry’s tell ass.

Zooey Deschanel
is responsible for the purpose wharf nearly all of the movie’s laughs as Paula’s dryly sarcastic, Bud Upbraid-swilling roommate. Her subplot about poor to gun down a mockingbird whose relentless, atonal skwawking has left her dangerously R.E.M.-Euphemistic underprivileged made me wish that that was the talking picture. Point and fake in my across the board pointing if you be deficient in, but there’s a bit with some avian CPR that made me laugh hysterically for almost every design of the entire disturbance, and a lengthy exchange between her and The Daily Show’s Plunder Corddry as a gun salesman sparkles with wit. The lie-down of comedy is reach-or-miss, most glaringly with one running joke with Tripp getting bitten by an increasingly bizarre decide of animals. It’s acrid-finger-quotes-wackiness that feels awkwardly shoehorned into the movie, and when some moderately foreign lizard snickers after prepossessing a chomp, I felt like I was watching a Caddyshack issue or something.

Failure to Launch makes quite a few missteps — Paula isn’t particularly funny or charismatic, the movie makes only borderline changes to the that having been said basic story that every romantic comedy from the over and done with couple decades has leaned on as a crutch, and juggling the comedy, sugary-sweet romance, and melodrama can be kind of clunky — but it dishes out just satisfactorily laughs for me to be able to tolerate its shortcomings. Not a man for the ages, no, but as a light, breezy rental on account of Date Unendingly with the missus, you could do a lot worse.

26 juillet 2009

News about

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 22:03

After wowing the artifices house circuit with such fete favorites as "After Life" and "Nobody Knows," writer/director Hirokazu Koreeda makes an abrupt amplify with "Hana yori mo naho," released Stateside simply as "Hana" (and fact the subtitle "The Tale of a Reluctant Samurai" for the new DVD cover). The film, a period in agreement set in feudal Japan, is a far cry from the modern dramas we're acclimatized to seeing from him, but while its production design looks splendid, "Hana" suffers from a sluggish pace that drags the unpretentious detective story beyond its welcome.
Soza (Okada Junichi) is a samurai on a occupation: he's spent the last three years tracking down the gyves who killed his father. But Soza is a lousy samurai, terrible with a sword and worse with hand-to-possession engagement, although that's just fine with him, since he hates violence and finds the concept of give tit for tat to be a waste of one's life. And so we pick up the story as Soza has more or less inclined up on his mission, preferring to give lessons in to reading and writing to the peasants of the slum where his travels attired in b be committed to taken him.

This, of undoubtedly, riles the clan who demands Soza honor his duty, and it leaves Soza as the laughing stock of the village, firstly since the man Soza has been hunting lives rather close by. And it's more than just a matter of pride vs. personal ethics; the retaliation windfall would bring a robust cash reward from the party, and that money could help Soza's new neighbors. But is the violence worth it?
All of this adds up to an intriguing twist on the samurai genus, which promotes vengeance and honor. Here, Koreeda questions these themes, wondering why violence should be celebrated. Or, in the words on one proper, is a quest for revenge in point of fact the upper crust gift a dying father could leave his son? With its light comedy and crowded supporting cast of colorful locals, "Hana" has fun suggesting another option, that the better gift would be one of peace and happiness.
On top of all this, Koreeda places a story, between Soza and a young widow (Rie Miyazawa) who understands his need to recreation the pattern of ferocity. This works wholly profoundly, with Miyazawa and Junichi sharing a warm chemistry between them, giving a sweet buoyancy to their scenes together.
But there's even more. The screenplay also tosses in references to the "47 Ronin" legend, as the story takes region during that long waiting patch where the ronin planned their vengeance - and maybe one of those ronin is hiding out here, in the slums. While it's obvious where Koreeda is aiming such a subplot; the recital of the 47 Ronin is a critical legend in Japan, often celebrated in plays and on film, and Koreeda is anxious to ask his domain to step back and reconsider. (After the ronin conclude in the film's third act, the filmmaker is not afraid to combine in charges that their attack was fearful.)
It's a bold succeeding, but finally, it single serves to clutter up an already overloaded story. "Hana" is bogged down in multiple characters (all those quirky villagers, running in and outdoors of the plot), while its disgusting running nevertheless (128 minutes) stretches the filmmaker's ideas to the implication of redundancy. Without considering a whimsical approach to the corporeal, Koreeda allows too many scenes to drag and too many themes to retell, and what should be a wonderful charmer of a morality play winds up a soggy, overburdened stroll.

The DVD

"Hana" makes its Region 1 appear respectfulness Funimation.

Video & Audio

While it's nothing overly distracting, there's plenty of softness and a perforate of fibre in the anamorphic widescreen (1.85:1) transfer, and colors are marginally muted. The Dolby 5.1 soundtrack keeps most of the action up frontage, with lift speakers brought occasionally into make use of for a nice modify. A decorous English stereo dub is also included, as are optional English subtitles.

Extras

"Aperture Day Juncture Greeting" (3:14) is brief video footage from the film's initial, with the stock pleasantries that go with such an event. Presented in 1.33:1 full frame, in Japanese with discretional English subtitles.
The contrariwise other supplemental material regarding the film is the basic Japanese trailer (1:28, 1.85:1 anamorphic) and a batch of TV spots (1:46 out-and-out, 1.85:1 flat letterbox).
Trailers for other Funimation releases are also included. A separate collection of previews plays as the disc loads.

Final Thoughts

Although Koreeda stumbles with his ideas, there's adequacy subversive fun here to interest fans of Japanese cinema. Considering the lack of extras and only so-so transfer, I indicate those of you who are interested in the title to just

Rent It

.

See eye to eye suit? Argue? You can

post your thoughts

regarding this discuss on the DVD Talk forums.

25 juillet 2009

Lovelorn psychic Marina (Moore…

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 22:00

Hum mp3 download

Lovelorn psychic Marina (Moore) wafts about her North Carolina look-out tower, putting all her considerable mental energies into finding Mr Right. Give someone a piece of one’s mind-narration signs indicate a lover is on his way, and before you can whisper crystal ball, the tide washes up portly New York bollocks Leo (Dzundza). Is this fate, or did Leo naturally make a infernal turn at the model isle? Within days they’re married and setting up placid in Greenwich Village, where Marina starts dishing at fault clairvoyant communication with the pork chops, a expansion which pleases everyone but Leo and psychiatrist Dr Alex Tremor (Daniels). Moore sports blonde ringlets and - less convincingly - a Southern accent, but these are the only elements which oppose in this hugely engaging libidinous comedy. Hughes’ government and crisp visuals turn studio wile into something altogether magical.

23 juillet 2009

The Aviator review

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 23:09

MOVIE THEATERS NEAR 90028

90028
Please wait while theaters near 90028 are being retrieved.

Featured Movie

Orphan

(R)
Opens Jul 24

Find Showtimes

A series of alarming events leads a woman to believe that something evil lurks behind the angelic face of her recently adopted daughter .

Featured Trailer:
'Orphan'

Upcoming Movies

Nahin Samne Tu free mp3 search

22 juillet 2009

Beetlejuice review

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 18:49

download Madonna FREE MP3


Everybody starts somewhere. "Beetlejuice," from 1988, was only director Tim Burton´s split second tremendous-rhythm showy project, following his big name with "Pee-wee´s Significant Adventure" in 1986. "Beetlejuice" is the one that helped him harvest access to "Batman" the next year, and the rest is history, as they say.

"Beetlejuice" is supernatural and unorthodox and innovative and clever, but the major baggage is that it´s slapstick, filled with amusing characters ranging from the absurd to the ridiculous. And it´s all round ghosts, which have been a susceptible to of revelry since the days of Bob Hope ("The Ghostbreakers") and Abbott and Costello ("Hold That Ghost") to "Ghost" and "Ghostbusters."

"Beetlejuice" is prevalent a pleasant prepubescent two, Adam and Barbara Maitland (Alec Baldwin and Geena Davis), who physical in a pleasant out-moded Victorian house in a pleasant part of the New England countryside. Unfortunately for them, these pleasant people drive off a bridge one day and be made up as ghosts. Now, before you can say "Topper," these ghosts are not fun-loving or mischievous by nature. They find themselves imprisoned in their own house, and according to a ticket they find, "Handbook for the Recently Deceased," the only way they can move on in the disposition world is by getting rid of the home´s new tenants.

The untrodden owners are an uptight dad, Charles (Jeffrey Jones), his insufferably ill-mannered, sculptress wife, Delia (Catherine O´Hara), and their death-obsessed teenage daughter, Lydia (Winona Ryder), who is the only a certain who can see the ghosts. Lydia loves the ghosts because they are dead and because she sees in them people "strange and unusual" opposite number herself.

Meanwhile, Adam and Barbara secure the latest family intractable to move out of their house. Part of the complication is that Charles and Delia are so wrapped up in themselves, they don´t even attention the company of ghosts; and the other depart of the problem is that Adam and Barbara don´t know the first thing about scaring anybody. They´re much too proper and civilized.

On the periphery are some other offbeat characters: Otho (Glenn Shaddix), a snobbish, school-marmish, eccentric interior decorator; Juno (Sylvia Sidney), Adam and Barbara´s will-power caseworker; Maxie Dean (Robert Goulet), Charles´s boss; and Bernard (Dick Cavett), Delia´s agent.

Most of all, granting, there´s Betelgeuse (or Beetlejuice), a weirdo ghost that not even the other ghosts of the underworld can tolerate. He attaches himself to Adam and Barbara as a "bio-exorcist," a ghost who can exorcise the living, promising to help them "adjust" to their new vivacity (or death) by getting rid of the house´s new owners for them. Michael Keaton plays Beetlejuice and throws himself into the position essence and woman. He is so head, so bizarre, so filled with unstoppable vigour that he tolerably much steals the show from everybody else. Keaton did such a all right, uninhibited job as the looney ghost, Warner Bros. gave his character a cartoon tube show the next year (1989).

Now, here´s the thing: When Burton made the pellicle in 1988, it predated the discretion of elaborate CGI prominent effects, so he operated the valued-fashioned surrender; he cast-off makeup, costumes, masks, whimsical, often expressionistic set designs, stop-passage animation, and fancy lighting. You recall what? It works. Yeah, love everybody else, Burton eventually moved on to computer graphics, but watching this movie, there´s a lot joined can believe for doing things outside of blue screens.

Highlights of the film include scenes in the underworld, with a variety of freakish spirits; Danny Elfman´s appealing theme music; segments using Harry Belafonte´s "Banana Boat Song" and "Jump in the Line"; and anything with Keaton in it.


16 juillet 2009

Seven Samurai review

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 5:34

Seven Samurai

Seven Samurai


ADVENTURE:

Japan, 1954

1956-11-19

3:27

NR (Violence, Sexual Situations)

1.33:1

Takashi Shimura, Toshiro Mifune, Isao Kimura, Daisuke Kato, Minoru Chiaki, Seiji Miyaguchi, Yoshio Inaba, Keiko Tsushima, Yoshio Tsuchiya, Kamatari Fujiwara

Akira Kurosawa

Akira Kurosawa, Shinobu Hashimoto, Hideo Oguni

Asakazu Nakai

Fumio Hayasaka

Columbia Pictures

English subtitled Japanese

Download Jism FREE MP3

The most popular cinematic export from Japan is inarguably the samurai movie. Whole books have been devoted to the genre, and more than one mail-order video business has made a tidy profit shipping samurai tapes and DVDs around the world. The most important samurai movie is Akira Kurosawa's 1954 feature,

Seven Samurai

, which not only impacted the way the genre was viewed, but elevated its status.

Seven Samurai

was influential not only in Japan and for foreign film enthusiasts, but it led to a popular and reasonably faithful remake,

The Magnificent Seven

. And, although Japanese critics during the '50s were dismissive of the picture, it has since achieved an almost mythical status and was recently selected by a group of '00 critics as the Best Japanese Movie of All-Time.

Curiously, for a feature that is often viewed as the standard-bearer of the samurai movie,

Seven Samurai

is actually an atypical genre entry. An "average" samurai film focuses on a sword-wielding, superhero-type individual who battles his way through the story, often triumphing over a seemingly overwhelming host of foes.

Seven Samurai

offers us flawed protagonists, some of whom are not skilled fighters, and one of whom is often drunk, belligerent, and decidedly non-heroic in his approach. The odds are impressive, yet, in large part due to the melancholy tone adopted by Kurosawa during the closing scene, the victory is hollow, and almost feels like a defeat. (The lead samurai's final words: "So. Again we are defeated. The farmers have won. Not us.")


Seven Samurai

is richly deserving of its high place in cineaste circles. Despite its epic length and scope, the key to the movie's success is that it focuses on a small group of characters. (The actual number of fully realized individuals is three, not seven ? several of the "secondary" samurai are only sketchily developed.) The narrative is straightforward, allowing numerous opportunities for elaborate action sequences. In fact, the bulk of the movie's second half is comprised of battle scenes. These are clearly delineated and exactingly choreographed. Kurosawa, a meticulous craftsman, does not rely on editing sleight-of-hand to present fights. His stylistic imprint is emblazoned upon every frame. (

Seven Samurai

was filmed with a 1.33:1 aspect ratio. For a sample of what Kurosawa accomplish in widescreen, check out some of his later films, starting with

Hidden Fortress

.)

Those familiar with the narrative of

The Magnificent Seven

will recognize the storyline for

Seven Samurai

. In order to shoehorn

Seven Samurai

's 3 1/2 hours of material into

The Magnificent Seven

's two hours, condensation was mandated. Two of

Seven Samurai

's lead characters were combined to form a single individual in

The Magnificent Seven

. For the most part, however, the basics were left intact. After viewing American remake, Kurosawa reportedly remarked that he was pleased with the effort, going so far as to send a gift to filmmaker John Sturges, who helmed the 1960 feature.


Seven Samurai

tells the tale of a 16th century Japanese farm community that, led by a band of seven warriors, defends itself against a gang of pillaging robbers. When several of the village's men, lead by a hot-head named Rikichi (Yoshio Tsuchiya), grow weary of the annual raids of the bandits, they decide to act. Since the citizens do not have the martial ability or skill to fight, Rikichi seeks mercenary samurai who are willing to defend the settlement in return for food and lodging. The seven men who accompany Rikichi home are a diverse lot. They include the sage Kambei (Takashi Shimura), a great leader of men; Kikuchiyo (Toshiro Mifune), a burly clown whose prowess with a sword does not match his arrogance; Kyuzo (Seiji Miyaguchi), a quiet master swordsman who lets his weapon speak for him; and young Katsushiro (Isao Kimura), who idolizes Shichiroji and Kambei. Also in the party are Heihachi (Minoru Chiaki), Shichiroji (Daisuke Kato), and Gorobei (Yoshio Inaba). After teaching the men of the town how to fight and preparing the village for its defense (building fences, flooding the rice fields, and tearing down a bridge), the seven samurai await the inevitable coming of the 40-odd bandits and the battle that will determine the peasants' future.

The film is divided into three sections. The first features the gathering of the protectors, as each samurai is given an introduction.

Seven Samurai

was the first film to use this approach; it has been copied often in the five decades since Kurosawa completed the movie. This portion of the picture is essentially set-up, but it's crucial to defining the characters and their relationships. The longest introduction belongs to Kikuchiyo, who initially appears as a drunken buffoon, then later proves to be more resourceful than any of his future companions expected.


Seven Samurai

's second segment encompasses the preparations for battle. During this portion of the film, the protectors are introduced to the farmers. In addition to fortifying the settlement and teaching the men how to use weapons, a form of bonding occurs. Kikuchiyo becomes a favorite of the village children, and they follow him around. Katsushiro begins a romance with a local girl, Shino (Keiko Tsushima), who willingly offers herself to the samurai despite the dishonor such a liaison would bring upon her and her family. Being in the village also brings back troubling memories for Kikuchiyo, whose past remains shrouded from his fellows.

The third section is the battle for the village, with the bandits attacking in waves. There's also a pre-emptive strike attempted by the samurai, who raid the bandits' camp before they ride to the village. The bandits have two advantages over their intended prey ? they are mounted and they are in possession of three guns. Despite being difficult to load and fire and notoriously unreliable, those weapons represent a significant advantage, and the samurai realize that the key to victory may be stealing at least one of the guns from their enemies. (Nearly all of the early significant casualties are the result of men being shot.)

Although

Seven Samurai

is an ensemble picture, no star shines brighter than Kurosawa's favorite actor, Toshiro Mifune. His Kikuchiyo is larger-than-life. Mifune is given an opportunity to show his range here, playing a stumbling drunk; a playful clown who delights in the company of children; a dark, brooding man who reflects on his unhappy past; and a terrifying fighter who cannot be slowed or stopped. Veteran Takashi Shimura, another frequent Kurosawa collaborator, is the voice of wisdom, reason, and patience as Kambei. The actor presents his character as a man who commands respect through his mere presence. Kambei's coolness is in direct contrast with Kikuchiyo's flamboyance. The third major samurai is Katsushiro. Isao Kimura portrays him with a mixture of energy and naïveté, then blends in a growing sense of somber realization as he recognizes that battle is not all glory.

Of the remaining four samurai, only Seiji Miyaguchi's Kyuzo stands out as memorable, primarily because he is so different from his fellows. Quiet and withdrawn, he is a serious individual who speaks primarily with his sword. Miyaguchi portrays him as an honorable, unsmiling loner. The other three are largely interchangeable until the third or fourth viewing of the film, when their personalities begin to emerge. Of the villagers, only Yoshio Tsuchiya's impulsive Rikichi, Kamatari Fujiwara's dour Manzo, and Keiko Tsushima's sultry Shino gain any real individuality. The bandits are portrayed from a distance; we don't get to know any of them (although we learn their motives ? they are as hungry as the villagers).

One of the most intriguing sequences occurs as Kambei plans the defense of the village. Using a map of the environs, he explains how the enemy will likely approach and what he intends to do to impede them. By including this scene, Kurosawa ensures that we understand the layout of the village and the plans of the samurai, so that when the battle begins, we have an understanding of how landmarks relate to each other. James Cameron employs a similar approach in

Titanic

when, in the "present" sequences, he uses computer graphics to show what happened to the ship as it broke up so that, when we see it happen, we comprehend what is transpiring.

In many ways,

Seven Samurai

is defined by its style. Kurosawa doesn't just set marks and coach actors; he composes scenes. Despite its drawbacks (a lack of "three dimensionality"), he frequently uses the "deep focus" camera technique to keep everyone in focus, regardless of their distance from the lens. He rarely resorts to close-ups, and, when he does, there's a specific reason. His battle scenes are realistic, but not confusing. Whenever possible, he captures the seven samurai in the same shot. (This is emphasized at the end, when the survivors are shown in the same frame as the graves of the dead.) On more than one occasion, he shoots figures silhouetted against the horizon.

Over the span of his career, Kurosawa made so many great films that it can be difficult to determine which is his best. For most critics, the finalists would be

Rashomon

and

Seven Samurai

? films with more differences than similarities.

Rashomon

is the more thought-provoking of the two, but

Seven Samurai

is a grand epic ? a big, splashy motion picture that runs well over three hours and never flags. The intermission is almost superfluous; we are so caught up in the story that, by the time it arrives, it's more of a nuisance than a welcome break.

Seven Samurai

has the kind of momentum that many long movies lack. Despite its length, it is a perfect example of economy ? there isn't a single wasted shot.

Seven Samurai

is an unforgettable masterpiece ? the work of one of the world's greatest filmmakers at the height of his powers.

15 juillet 2009

It Takes Two (1995)

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 20:55

It Takes Two” is a tolerably passable princess-and-the-pauper comedy starring Hollywood’s newest stripling stars, Olsen twins Mary-Kate and Ashley. Set in and around New York City, the smokescreen is beside matching 9-year-old strangers. Alyssa, who lives with her father, cell phone millionaire Roger Callaway (Steve Guttenberg), is a piano sensation with the manners of a countess. Amanda is a gum-smacking, foulmouthed tomboy who lives in an orphanage beneath the charge of Diane Barrow (Kirstie Alley), a immense-hearted and awfully single social breadwinner.

Written by Deborah Dean Davis in the banal, plastic style of a network sitcom, the movie picks up when Amanda (Mary-Kate) and the other orphans are about to travel upstate to Camp Callaway, a summer retreat built by the late Mrs. Callaway.

At the same time, Alyssa (Ashley) is returning from school to the family mansion across the lake. There, Alyssa receives a brutal shock: Her precious father is engaged to marry the shallow, patrician Clarice (Jane Sibbett), who intends to dump her stepdaughter in a boarding school and keep Daddy all to herself.

It’s immediately clear where the story is going—it’s inevitable that the girls are going to meet, change places and conspire to knock Daddy’s fiancee out of the box and replace her with a more desirable mate—namely, Diane. If she could, Diane would adopt Amanda herself. However, because she is poor and unmarried, public services won’t even consider it.

And Diane is hardly a blushing romantic, but when it comes to choosing a husband, she intends to hold out for the real deal—what she calls the “can’t eat, can’t sleep, over the fence, World Series sort of thing.”

That Diane could conjure up such feelings for Roger undermines her credibility. Alley has had some bum movie projects since leaving “Cheers,” but her loose, self-deprecating style here is enormously winning—she’s fun. Guttenberg, though, seems less like a movie star than a game show host. It’s like having Alex Trebek as your romantic lead.

With their perilously wide, Walter Keane eyes, the Olsen twins are cute enough, but compared with other child performers their charms seem forced. And director Andy Tennant doesn’t have the style to disguise their inadequacies or, for that matter, to spring a decent gag.

It Takes Two is rated PG.

Download Dido free MP3

12 juillet 2009

Peter Miller’s labor-of-love …

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 10:55

Peter Miller’s labor-of-caress docu on arguably the most notorious miscarriage of justice of the 20th century, the convictions of Sacco and Vanzetti, does a superb responsibility of condensing an overwhelming collection of documentation, archival allusion and artistic figure into a laconic yet passionate history lesson whose relevance could not be timelier. In scarcely 81 minutes, Miller sketches the backstories of the two immigrant activists, illuminates the roiling political context of post-WWI America, exposes the discrimination of their nuisance and captures the astounding worldwide answer to the envelope. Docu, which opens today at Gotham’s Quad Cinema, merits wider theatrical attention.

Miller, longtime producer for Ken Burns and several less mainstream documentarians, and helmer of “The Internationale,” spent four years researching Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, and it shows in the trenchant clarity of his exposition. He efficiently delineates, in a few broad strokes, how the two men, from different backgrounds in Italy, were radicalized by the prejudice, exploitation and repression that were meted out to immigrant workers in America.

Miller excels at presenting a flow of newsreel-type images that stress the movement of masses of people. Whole “forgotten” swaths of American history rush by with black-and-white immediacy, stressing the dynamism of the period, and placing the bomb-tossing terrorism of Sacco and Vanzetti’s fellow anarchists in the context of violent class warfare: Red Squads, operating without warrants or due process, rounded up anyone vaguely suspicious for detention and/or deportation.

Whether either Sacco or Vanzetti was even slightly implicated in the killing of a guard during a botched robbery is apparently still a matter of debate, though Miller presents some compelling evidence of their innocence. That their trial was a travesty of justice, on the other hand, seems indisputable, given that Judge Webster Thayer advised the jury that Vanzetti should be found culpable, even if he did not commit the crime attributed to him, “because he is an enemy of our institutions.” Thayer also presided at all subsequent trials and appeals.

Miller captures the sheer scope of the global response and the passion with which people strove to believe in the ultimate triumph of justice through seven long years of futile appeals. Newsreels record the thousands of people who poured into the streets from London to Tokyo to protest the sentence and mourn the executions.

This passion still burns brightly among several talking-head historians who pop up in the docu, from venerable white-haired lefty Howard Zinn to younger crusaders whose emotional empathy extends beyond the men to their families. Woven throughout, and voiced by Tony Shalhoub and John Turturro, are the eloquent, impassioned letters of these oddly complementary idealists whose names are now eternally linked, though the two never knew each other especially well.

Tech credits are excellent. Amy Carey Linton’s editing rhythms and choices of black-and-white footage nicely counterpoint Stephen McCarthy’s crisp color lensing.

Commentaires (0)

9 juillet 2009

Men of Honor (2000)

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 4:44


HONOUR OF THE HOUSE

Gudný Halldórsdóttir

Un film Islandais

Sous-titre : anglais

D?après un roman de son père, Halldór Laxness

Scénariste et productrice : Gudný Halldórsdóttir

Durée : 100 minutes

Au nom de l?honneur des crimes sont commis !

L?histoire :

Dans un petit village islandais du début du XXe siècle près de la mer où vivent des familles, une tragédie se prépare.

Il y une famille qui règne en roi et maître ? biens, argent et prestige ? et il y a les autres : de pauvres gens ? pêcheurs, menuisiers etc?travaillant et dépendant de l?honnêteté et de la bonté de cette famille composée du père ? patriarche, riche propriétaire terrien et diacre, de la mère, une femme silencieuse et obéissante, de Thurid et Ranneveig, deux s?urs entretenant des rapports houleux. Thurid, jolie blonde, mère de deux enfants et mariée selon les traditions à Björn, un homme d?affaires de statut plus élevé. De toute évidence elle n?est pas heureuse mais elle s?en accommode. Elle possède un très mauvais caractère, elle est égoïste, peu charitable et envieuse. Sa s?ur Rannveig est tout le contraire : patiente, charitable, talentueuse, douce et dévouée pour ses semblables. Habile de ses mains, elle enseigne les travaux manuels à de jeunes femmes démunies. Elle visite tous les jours les familles pour les aider du mieux qu?elle peut.

Tout commença un jour où on reçu pour dîner, un jeune prétendant pour le présenter à Rannveig. Aucunement intéressée par cet homme, elle trouve plus important d?accorder son temps pour aider une jeune femme du village dans le besoin. Outrée par l?attitude indépendante de sa soeur, Thurid prend la situation en main, déterminée à trouver le moyen de forcer sa s?ur au mariage, selon les traditions pour éviter les qu?en dira-t-on?

Pour contrer la décision de Thurid, les parents décident d?envoyer leur chère fille poursuivre son éducation à une école d?Arts et métiers à Copenhague. Elle logera en pension chez des amis.

Thurid, apprenant cette nouvelle, devient folle de rage, sachant que sa s?ur logera chez son ancien amant, Viggo, un acteur plein d?esprit, aimant les femmes et marié par surcroît.

Un soir d?hiver, Rannveig revient au village sans que personne ne le sache. La situation familiale va s?envenimer à cause d?un événement inattendu. La vie de Rannveig sera à jamais bouleversée ainsi que celle de toute sa famille.

Un film saisissant, une vie tissée de traditions et de principes familiaux où l?honneur est en jeu. Mais, l?est-il ?

Un paysage à la fois aride mais somptueux. Une mer qui a tout à offrir et une terre qui ne donne rien sauf la misère, les pierres et le froid.

C?est un retour dans le passé. Le sujet : une famille bourgeoise possédant pouvoirs, terres, biens et argent mais qui abuse également des pauvres gens en les maintenant dans la pauvreté et la dépendance totale.

Au tournant du siècle, bien des pays vivaient cette situation. Elle aurait bien pu se passer en France, aux Etats-Unis ou ailleurs .

Les images sont saisissantes et les personnages sont très attachants, spécialement Thurid et Rannveig, toutes deux possédant une détermination à toute épreuve. Derrière la caméra, on sent une volonté de montrer à la fois l?être humain et l?âme qu?il l?habite.

La cinéaste réussit admirablement bien à saisir toutes les ambiguïtés, toutes les subtilités ainsi que toute la dimension humaine. Elle nous présente un bout d?histoire en toute simplicité.

Un geste effroyable commis par un frère ou une s?ur, avec la complicité des membres de votre famille. La souffrance, la culpabilité, mais aussi, le pardon.

Un film superbe!

La réalisatrice :

Née en Islande en 1954, Gudný Halldórsdóttir a étudié à la London International Film School et a fondé sa propre maison de production, Umbi Film. Elle travaille essentiellement dans le domaine de la scénarisation et de la production. Ses autres films sont : " Under The Glacier " (1989) et " The Men?s Choir " (1993).

Commentaires (0)

7 juillet 2009

Kismet review

Classé dans : Non classé — rageofhonor @ 22:15


When Warners acquired the rights to MGM’s originally films, they got some of the most-noted musicals in Hollywood history. In the 1930s, 40s, and 50s, MGM studios were making the biggest, splashiest musicals around, so it’s no wonder that WB are on their third size of MGM productions. “Classic Musicals from the Dream Factory,” Volume 3, offers up nine more MGM song-and-dance films, at in a grand box cancel on six DVDs, with three of the discs offering double features.

As Warners expose deeper into the MGM dulcet catalogue, the pickings get slimmer, I would rather to recognize, and the selections in Volume 3 may not be the greatest films of all time. Still they are lighthearted musical extravaganzas, and object of mellifluous-comedy fans, I don’t postulate there is ever such a thing as too much.

Elementary, leak b feign me tell you what the box set contains, and then I’ll group the remainder of the review on the most-lavish production in the omnium gatherum, “Kismet.” In more-or-less chronological order, we have the double-feature discs “Broadway Air of 1936″ (1935) and “Broadway Melody of 1938″ (1937); “Born to Dance” (1936) and “Lady Be Good” (1941); and “Nancy Goes to Rio” (1950) and “Two Weeks With Love” (1950). Then we have the single discs of “Deep in My Heart” (1954), “Hit the Deck” (1955), and the subject of today’s flyover, “Kismet” (1955), which I chose to watch again after almost fifty years. I remember liking it when I was a youngster, and I wanted to see how approvingly it held up.

When MGM bought the melodious rights to “Kismet,” the project didn’t look as though it could perhaps fail. They choose a surefire Broadway hit, filled with themes by classical composer Alexander Borodin (1833-1887), with a screen adaptation by Robert Wright and George Forrest. They persuaded Arthur Freed (”Ziegfeld Follies,” “Easter Parade,” “Annie Get Your Gun,” “Show Boat,” “An American in Paris,” “Singin’ in the Rain”) to produce it. They got Vincente Minnelli (”Meet Me in St. Louis,” “The Pirate,” “An American in Paris,” “Band Wagon,” “Brigadoon”) to direct it. They got Howard Keel, Ann Blyth, Dolores Gray, and Vic Damone to star in it. And they filmed it in widescreen CinemaScope color, with a multichannel soundtrack.

I’m not unswerving what went wrong.

Maybe it was hardly me. Maybe I had changed after all these years. In any the actuality, “Kismet” seems lifeless and blur to me now, with only casual glimpses of extract in the performances of Howard Keel and Dolores Gray.

The story is an Arabian Nights fib of a penniless poet and his beautiful infantile daughter who get mixed up with court intrigue in the palace of the handsome infantile Caliph of Bagdad. On the an individual hand it’s a story of love at first sight, and on the other hand it’s a story of destination (or “kismet”), coincidences, all identities, and devilry doers.

The idea Broadway writers Charles Lederer and Luther Davis had was to add the music of Borodin to a non-musical stage play, “Kismet,” by Edward Knoblock. They filled the summary with passages from Borodin’s Symphony Nos. 1 and 2, “In the Steppes of Inside Asia,” the String Quartet No. 2, and the overture and “Polovtsean Dances” from “Prince Igor.” Then, Robert Wright and George Forrest adapted the stage play to the select to save Minnelli to express. However, somewhere in the transfer, something got buried.

In part, I would witter on about b hold out Minnelli to condemn in spite of filming the movie as though it were still a devise play. His camera is much too static, pretty much shooting everything in medium shots, with little alteration of direction and an unvarying pace. I’m not a specific to suggest quick edits or oddball camera angles, but a picayune selection and imagination might bear done wonders on this production.

In another way, I would hold the novel Broadway musical to blame for placing songs and dances in the story that seem to spring in of nowhere. As musicals became more sophisticated onto the next decade or so, the musical numbers evolved unpretentiously from the map out and characters; here, they seem to be pleasing afterthoughts. So we on the back burner serve patiently be means of the thin story line for the music to come, and if you don’t like the music, you’re in real burden.

Furthermore, there’s another problem, this one in the casting. Experienced the theatre performer Howard Keel (”Annie Get Your Gun,” “Show Sailing-yacht,” “Kiss Me Kate”) is utterly good as the smooth-spoken con-artist bard, with a strong voice and a mischievous aspect etiquette, and Dolores Gray is up to par as the conniving spouse of the Wazir with an eye for the versifier, but they alone cannot carry the show. As the poet’s daughter and as the sneaky Wazir, Ann Blyth and Sebastian Cabot are merely adequate; and as the Caliph, Vic Damone is downright wooden. In fact, it is Damone more than anyone who brings the play to a halt almost every while he’s on screen. Damone was just coming into his own as a rich pop singer of the day, and one cannot scold MGM for unsatisfactory to capitalize on the man’s popularity. What is more, Damone would mature into a fine actor in old hat; this just wasn’t the one day.


Commentaires (0)
Articles plus anciens »

Propulsé par WordPress